<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Comments on Comment Spam Review Process - AddedBytes.com</title><link>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/</link><description>Latest comments on Comment Spam Review Process on AddedBytes.com</description><!-- ckey="76C662BB" --><item><title>Comment on Comment Spam Review Process</title><link>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</link><guid>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</guid><description>Comment by Visitor785 ( &lt;a href="http://ayk.com"&gt;http://ayk.com&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Your site found in Google: http://google.com/search?q=mjx</description></item><item><title>Comment on Comment Spam Review Process</title><link>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</link><guid>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</guid><description>Comment by Dan ( &lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dave, I am working on such a system.  Perhaps if I get it working, I'll let you know.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the system works, it should catch 95-98% of spam I reckon.</description></item><item><title>Comment on Comment Spam Review Process</title><link>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</link><guid>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</guid><description>Comment by Dave Child ( &lt;a href="http://www.addedbytes.com"&gt;http://www.addedbytes.com&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I avoid the CAPTCHA option because I think making authentic users do more work to compensate for spammers is going about things backwards. I want a system that doesn't affect genuine commenters and makes life harder for spammers.</description></item><item><title>Comment on Comment Spam Review Process</title><link>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</link><guid>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</guid><description>Comment by Converse ( &lt;a href="http://www.converseshoes.us/"&gt;http://www.converseshoes.us/&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Don't know why you're trying to avoid captcha option. But It really helps prevent automated comments. I think you should give it a send thought.</description></item><item><title>Comment on Comment Spam Review Process</title><link>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</link><guid>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</guid><description>Comment by Anders Moen ( &lt;a href="http://andersmoen.com"&gt;http://andersmoen.com&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;..?</description></item><item><title>Comment on Comment Spam Review Process</title><link>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</link><guid>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</guid><description>Comment by Dave Child ( &lt;a href="http://www.addedbytes.com"&gt;http://www.addedbytes.com&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Aaron: I'm trying really hard to avoid the captcha option :). I'm a little surprised your comment went unmoderated too. Something's not working as it should be! I think, for now, I'm going to add a hidden form field with a generated code. Only comments submitted with valid codes would be accepted - that should curb the automated spam at least. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Cameron: Yes, I'm using akismet. For the most part it catches spam comments, and puts them in the moderation queue, but it's not reliable.</description></item><item><title>Comment on Comment Spam Review Process</title><link>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</link><guid>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</guid><description>Comment by cameron ( &lt;a href="http://desk003.com"&gt;http://desk003.com&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do you use akismet? Since installing it last year I don't get any spam comments (or at least very few)</description></item><item><title>Comment on Comment Spam Review Process</title><link>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</link><guid>http://www.addedbytes.com/article/comment-spam-review-process/comments/</guid><description>Comment by Aaron Bassett ( &lt;a href="http://foobr.co.uk"&gt;http://foobr.co.uk&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I wondered why all my comments about a great new poker site, or where to get cheap v1agra (now this comment is definitely getting moderated) never got posted ;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Might be time to look at a system similar to wp-gatekeeper by Eric Meyer. A captcha system without the accessibility problems of using images. I've been using it for a while now, and while Askimet still has to block some spam messages its not as bad as it could be.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only problem I have is from actual people submitting comments which *could* be valid but are most likely just looking for a link back. They're always along the lines of 'X is great, thanks for posting about it!' &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know they don't add any additional information to the post, but I don't like to remove them incase it is a genuine show of appreciation, cause that would somehow seem rude(!?)&lt;br /&gt;And of course I don't want to scare people away from telling me how great I am ;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What I might end up doing is marking those types of comments as 'temp' and then run a cron job or something every week to remove any which are over X days old. Leaving only comments that add additional relevant information in the archive.</description></item></channel></rss>