http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/Latest comments on Prime Numbers From 0 to 10000 on AddedBytes.comhttp://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/Comment by aha:) ( <a href=""></a> )<br /><br />thanks a bunches! i personally don't know why others are asking for the list to be longer, it is certainly long enough! :-)http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/Comment by Dave ( <a href=""></a> )<br /><br />I'll share some "factoids about primes" from the book THE GOLDEN RATIO by Mario Livio.<br /> <br /> The number 1,234,567,891 (all digits) is a prime.<br /> <br /> The 230th largest prime has 6,400 digits...6,399 or them are 9's, one is an 8.<br /> <br /> The number composed of 317 iterations of the digit 1 is a prime.<br /> <br /> The 713th largest prime can be written as: 10^1951 x (10^1975 + 1991991991991991991991991) + 1. This, of course was discovered in 1991. (Someone had far too much time on their hands!)http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/Comment by Dave ( <a href=""></a> )<br /><br />I have two questions about the current state of knowledge about prime numbers. 1) Do you know if anyone has either shown that: a) the set of twinned prime numbers (primes that differ by 2, such as 11-13, 41-43, 107-109) is infinite, or b) that the set is bounded and the final pair in the set is ___ & ___ ? 2) Does the density of prime numbers remain the same or decrease as one moves out on the number line, and if it decreases has anyone establishes a relationship with the rate of decline that still leaves the total number of primes infinite despite some methodical decay in that density?http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/Comment by smile:) ( <a href=""></a> )<br /><br />TY. Very helpful with my work. Just what i neededhttp://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/Comment by Dave Child ( <a href="http://www.addedbytes.com">http://www.addedbytes.com</a> )<br /><br />1 and 0 aren't in the list, hihi.<br /> <br /> And 0 either has 1 factor (0) or infinite factors (depending on which way you argue it).http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/Comment by hihi ( <a href=""></a> )<br /><br />the list is gr8 ty i love math<br /> <br /> http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/Comment by hihi ( <a href=""></a> )<br /><br />1 and 0 are not primes 1 got 1 factor and 0 has nonehttp://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/Comment by Jeff ( <a href=""></a> )<br /><br />Thanks for the list!http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/Comment by NATASHA M.R ( <a href="http://www.natot2589@yahoo.com">http://www.natot2589@yahoo.com</a> )<br /><br />i think you should extend the list of prime nos... but you ve done a good job manhttp://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/http://www.addedbytes.com/article/prime-numbers/comments/Comment by Alex Clark ( <a href=""></a> )<br /><br />187 is not a prime number because it is divisible by 11 and 17